Artistic and Cognitive Properties of Lexical Homonyms in the Uzbek and Turkish Languages

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71078/80596a98

Keywords:

homonymy, lexical homonyms, interlingual homonyms, tuyuq (a genre of Turkic poetry), tajnis (paronomasia, wordplay based on homonymy)

Abstract

The linguacognitive approach has practical significance in the analysis of speech mechanisms, the processes of reflecting information about the picture of the world and being in linguistic consciousness, the assimilation of word meanings and the storage of concepts in linguistic memory, the perception of the characteristics of objects and events, the semantic development of lexemes, the relationship between form and content in understanding lexical meaning. Lexical homonyms in the Uzbek and Turkish languages, in addition to the semantic, structural and grammatical form, also have content associated with the cognitive structure. In this regard, the linguacognitive analysis of lexical homonyms in the Uzbek and Turkish languages is important for clarifying the features of these languages associated with the formation and development of thinking, perception, imagination of the mental lexicon.The article examines lexical homonymy as a factor in the development of thinking and provides a cognitive-semantic analysis of the genres of tuyuk, askiya, iyhom, tajnis.

Author Biography

  • M. Abdurahmanova, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek

    PhD, Associate Professor

References

Аракин, В.Д. (1978). Об омонимах в турецком языке. Советская тюркология, 2. – 48-61.

Арнольд, И.В. (1954). Лексикология современного английского языка.

Копотев, М.В., Мустайоки, А. (2008). Современная корпусная русистика. Slavica Helsingiyensia. Инструментарий русистики: корпусные подходы. Хельсинки, – 10-13.

Лурия, А.Р.( 2009). Основные проблемы нейролингвистики.

Машраббекова, А. (2009). Лексические параллели в тюркских языках и их возникновение. Филология: научные исследования, 2. – 51-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2019.2.29444

Навоий, А. (1983). Мукаммал асарлар тўплами 20 томлик. 1-том. Бадойиъ ул бидоя. Тошкент. Фан.

Норман, Б.Ю. (1974). Психолингвистический эксперимент с синтаксически омонимичными предложениями. Вопросы лексики и синтаксиса. – 145-150.

Парфи Рауф (2013). Туркистон руҳи. Сайланма. Тошкент.

Реформатский, А.А.(1967). Введение в языкознание. Москва.

Рябцева, Э.К. (1973). О понимании студентами явления грамматической омонимии при чтении научно-технической литературы (По результатом эксперимента). Некоторые вопросы методики преподавания иностранных языков в школе и вузе. – 75-87.

Севортян, Э.В. (1956). Аффиксы глаголообразования в азербайджанском языке. Москва.

Abdurahmanova, M., Bozorova, S. (2023). Alisher Navoiy – omonimiya nazariyasi asoschisi Alisher Navoiy va XXI asr. 8-Uluslararo konferansi materiallari. Toshkent-Boku, B. 327-334.

Hasan Furkan Polat (2020). Sırpça, Hırvatça, Boşnakça – Türkçe Sesteş Kelimeler. Edirne.

Homidov, H. (2020). Turk tili. Toshkent.

Ibragimova, Z. (2021). “Muhokamat ul-lug‘atayn” asarining ilmiy ahamiyati. O‘zbek mutafakkirlarining til nazariyasiga oid qarashlari. Xalqaro ilmiy-nazariy anjuman materiallari. Toshkent, B. 180.

Jamolxonov, H.( 2005). Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili. Toshkent. Talqin.

Kiziltunç, Recai (2008). Türk Edebiyatında Tuyug ve Bazi Problemleri. A.Ü. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi.Sayı 37, Erzurum. – S.107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14222/Turkiyat785

Koraş, Hikmet (2009). Özbek Şairi Rauf Parfi. 1. Başkı. Konya.

Kübra, Hadra & Tamtamış, Erkınay (2022). Çok Anlamlılıktan Eş Adlılığa Doğru Tarihsel Bir Yolculuk. A Historical Travel from Polysemy to Homonym folk/ed. Derg,; 28(1) – S. 109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.1787

Pala, İ.(2008). Divan Edebiyatı. İstanbul. Sertifika Matbaası.

Püsküllüoğlu, Ali (2002). Öz Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara

Rahmatullayev, Sh. (2006). Hozirgi adabiy o‘zbek tili. Toshkent. Universitet.

Rahmonov, V. (2014). Alisher Navoiy. Muhokamat ul-lugʻatayn. Toshkent. Tafakkur.

Sakar, Ekrem (2021). Türkçede Eş Biçimlilik Meselesi. Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları (DEA), Bahar, S. 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30767/diledeara.823748

Tamtamış, Erkınay & Kübra, Hadra (2021). (Türkçede Eş Adlılık) Homonym in Turkish. Journal of Academic Language and Literature, 5 (1). – 619-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34083/akaded.899583

Yusuf, Berdak (2009). Turkcha-O‘zbekcha “Aldoqchi” so‘zlar lug‘ati. Toshkent.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

Issue

Section

Turkic Studies

How to Cite

Artistic and Cognitive Properties of Lexical Homonyms in the Uzbek and Turkish Languages. (2025). Qutty Bilik, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.71078/80596a98