Binary Relations in Abai’s Language

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71078/em5vqh55

Keywords:

Abai Kunanbaev, Kazakh language, binary relationships, opposition connectors, linguophilosophy

Abstract

The conceptual reflections and humanistic ideas of Abai Kunanbaiuly, the great son of the Kazakh people, dedicated to his native people and universal human values, lie at the core of the spiritual development of the modern Kazakh world. This article focuses on analyzing linguistic units that characterize binary relationships in the language of Abai’s works. A sequence of ideological symbols, consolidated around a multi-layered concept, encompasses synonymous, intermediate, and antinomic notions based on shared features. The polar boundaries of each sequence are closed by opposing meanings. Philosophers’ recognition of the concept as a unity of contradictions, in line with the dualistic theory of dialectics, also stems from this. In linguistic science, such oppositional connectors in the noospheric world manifest through binary pairs in the linguistic realm. The linguistic units describing binary relationships in language intertwine with the linguo-philosophical phenomenon linked to the dialectical law of the unity and struggle of opposites.

Overall, while language is a systematic structure and a complex noospheric phenomenon, its inherent nature is full of contradictions. Since humanity is considered a part of nature, its language is both a natural microcomponent and a multifaceted category that reveals human existence, distinguishes humans from other living beings, defines human cognition and quality, and reflects the unique mental characteristics of a linguistic community or ethnicity. The binary relationships in Abai’s language include oppositions such as “life – death,” “soul – body,” “existence – non-existence,” “good – evil,” “wisdom – ignorance,” “faithfulness – faithlessness,” “father – child,” etc. The ethno-cultural content of lexemes describing these binary relationships in Abai’s language elucidates the great thinker’s intricate system of thought and worldview.

Author Biography

  • Magripa Yeskeyeva, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University

    Doctor of Philology, Professor

References

Абай. (Ибраһим Құнанбаев). (2005). Өлеңдер, поэмалар, аудармалар мен қарасөздер. Алматы: Жібек жолы.

Древнетюркский словарь. (1969). Под. Ред. В.М. Наделяева, Д.М. Насилова, Э.Р. Тенишева, А.М. Щербака. Ленинград: Наука.

Древние тюркские диалекты и их отражение в современных языках. (1971) Под ред. И.А. Батманова. Фрунзе: Илим.

Ескеева, М.Қ. (2011). Көне түркі жазба мұраларының лингвофилософиялық негізі. Астана: Сарыарқа.

Есім, Ғ.(2012). Хакім Абай. Астана: Фолиант.

Колесов, В.В. (2004). Язык и ментальность. Санкт-Петербург: Петербург. Востоковедение.

Қазақ тілінің түсіндірме сөздігі (2008). Алматы: Дайк-Пресс.

Севортян, Э.В., & Левитская, Л.С. (1989). Этимологический словарь тюркских языков. (IV т.) Москва: Наука.

Стеблева И. В. (1972). О реконструкции древнетюркской религиозно-мифологической системы В Тюркологический сборник (С. 213-226). Москва: Наука.

Тоқаев, Қ.К. (2023). Абай және ХХІ ғасырдағы Қазақстан. http://www.akorda.kz/

Щур, Г.С. (1974). Теория поля в лингвистике. Москва: Наука.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-21

Issue

Section

Turkic Studies

How to Cite